IndyCar All Access: Roundtable: Recap of Milwaukee and Preview Iowa

06/22/2012

IndyCar All Access Roundtable is back! After a mere month off, we are back to the business that we do best. And we’ve made some changes to the panel. We’ve dropped Matt Hickey and Tony Tellez after a situation, but we do retain Matt Bauer, John Hetrick, Jerry Cruz and myself. John Oreovicz will not be in this roundtable due to other commitments.

Q: Thoughts on Milwaukee

JC: The racing in general was great. I don’t like spread-out-racing on ovals but the tire-management strategies are interesting. The crowd was bigger than last year (probably 70% full based on infield fans) and the positive atmosphere was evident even at the TV broadcast. Great job by Andretti Sports Marketing team.

JH: I thought it was a good race. Not a great race but it had a lot of storylines throughout the race that kept it interesting. I think Ryan Hunter-Reay is entering the prime of his career and will win a lot more races in the years to come. He is a fantastic driver on road/streets and ovals and I feel that he will be a contender in each race the rest of the way out and very well could catch Will Power. It is too bad that rain pushed the finish of the race to ESPNews. Just terrible luck for Indycar and Michael Andretti. ABC is such a poor partner and really doesn’t seem to care about growing the sport. It is very good news that Milwaukee will continue to be on the schedule next year. Just hope for better weather.

MB: Loved the aero changes for the race, making the cars harder to drive just increased the excitement level & made the race more competitive. Wins should be earned not just someone getting lucky at the end of the race. Scott Dixon getting hosed was unacceptable but nice to see race control own up to the mistake & move on & improve.

KM: I thought that the race was excellent. I can speak about the attendance because I was there, the attendance was great and overall structure of the event was great. Definitely want to go there next year!

Q: What track should replace the China race, please explain your reasoning?

JC: I really don’t have any preference as long as it is fast and entertaining. No parades, no spread-out racing. I think there is a BIG chance that BOTH Michigan International Speedway AND Road America get the nod. Both fit well on the current schedule and would be a great introduction for next year’s schedule.

JH: I would really like to see Pocono replace China. It is such a historic track for open wheel racing. I have heard many stories of my uncle and grandfather going to Pocono to the races in the 70′s. I would just love to see how these new cars would do around the track. Saying that I think it will be on the 2013 schedule and Road America will replace China this year. Which is a fine choice as well. 

MB: I think the only viable choice for a China replacement is Road America. Indycar needs to be at RA it’s the best road course in America & coupled with ALMS would make a great event. Indycar doesn’t have the time or resources to put on & promote a proper event.

KM: I believe that Road America is the only choice. Randy wanted them this year but he got screwed over by Terry Angstadt. Road America is an excellent track and I don’t see why we won’t go up there.

Q: Do you like the heat race format for Iowa qualifying? Will it work? Why or why not.

JC: I’m all for the entertainment element of the series. INDYCAR is a sport and therefore a business to entertain people. If this is what will make fans put their butts on the seats at the track and eyeballs on the TV…GO FOR IT!!!

JH: I love the idea but I don’t think it will work. The only way the heat races work is if the drivers go for it. I really hope these races are exciting but I doubt that the drivers take many risks. Too bad Tomas Schecter isn’t around this year. He would be very exciting to watch in these races!

MB: Single car qualifying at any track other than Indianapolis is pretty dull so I’m open to the idea but it does seem like a practice session & what happens if the drivers don take it seriously or there are crashes?

KM: I like the idea but I think they should do it the way NASCAR does it for the Daytona 500. It would be way easier, it might work.

Q: Winner for the Iowa Corn Indy 250?

JC:Wow, this season has gone from predictable (Will Power) to unpredictable (Justin Wilson)…and all the intrigue on winners has been on the oval-side of the season. I will go with James Hinchcliffe to make 3 surprises in a row!!! He is more than capable and he should win at least 1 race this season.

JH: I am going to go with Kanaan. He ran well ther last year and probably had a chance to win if it wasn’t for Marco making sure he didn’t get passed him. I feel like he has had a good car this year but just hasn’t gotten over the hump. I think he gets it done under the lights at Iowa.

MB: Scott Dixon for the win. I think after crashing at Texas after dominating the race & after struggling in qualifying & being the victim of a bad call last week he will be on a mission.

KM: I’m going to go with Marco Andretti, yes he has struggled this year but this is a great time to turn around his season and make a run to the top ten in points. Plus it helps to be a defending race winner. Marco’s average finish at Iowa is:  6.6.

Who’s your winner this weekend?

Poll question of the week: Which track should replace China on the schedule?

 


IndyCar All-Access: Recap of Barber Plus Long Beach Preview

04/12/2012

Photo Credit: More Front Wing

First off, we are very sorry that we couldn’t recap St. Petersburg and preview Barber.  We will not have Matt Hickey with us this weekend due to other commitments.

Participants:

  • John Oreovicz  @indyoreo
  • Matt Bauer @bauerracing
  • Jerry Cruz @jerrycruz1077
  • John Hetrick @hetrick32
  • Tony Tellez @tonytellez
  • Kent Mueller @Kent_RM
*Note: All Chevrolet drivers will face a ten position grid penalty after they changed all of there engines. This was written before this news broke so please keep that in mind.

This week marks the 38th Toyota Grand Prix of Long Beach. Very historic.

Track Layout: 1.96 mile temporary street circuit.

Photo Credit: Etracks

Now to the questions for this week.

Photo Credit: RACER

Q: Thoughts on Barber?

JO: I thought it was an excellent race. Although he ultimately took the lead during a pit stop exchange, Power passed several cars to get in that position and there was plenty of passing through the field. The cars were generally reliable and raced well and Firestone got a lot of praise for supplying tires that dropped off in performance over the course of a full stint. That disparity, and the variable of tire management, made for a lot of movement up and down through the field. Beaux Barfield has done a good job of delaying full course yellows to allow drivers to make pit stops and the open pit rule being introduced at Long Beach should help even more.

MB: It’s just my luck that the one time I don’t go to Barber I miss seeing one of the best road races in 15-20 years. Firestone really brought some great tires the were predictable & helped make some great passing. Power was as great as ever I never thought he could have come from so far behind in that scenario. I’ve raced on that track & know how difficult passing can be.

JC: I think the best road course race I have seen in terms of entertainment and competition since Toronto 2011 and those awesome Cleveland GPs of the past.

JH: Could not have asked for a better race. Great action on the track with lots of passing.
Might have to attend this race next year since everybody says how beautiful the track is!

TT: Barber was some of the best racing and side by side action that I have seen in a while in the IICS.  Watching Marco, Graham, and Bourdais move their way through the field was a rush.  We need more racing like this.  I was a bit disappointed with some of the slower traffic (Lotus) holding up the leaders, and think it contributed to the outcome of the race in the long run.  Honda was really strong here, and in my opinion should have been atop the podium but for a minor mistake

KM: Great race. I’ve always been negative on this race but I shall no more. This was the best racing on a road or a street course since the hay day of CART. Yes, the track layout needs a lot of work but great race overall.

Q: Thoughts on Houston and the 2013 schedule news from Robin Miller?

JO: I’ve long believed that Mike Lanigan would have been better off reviving Cleveland instead of Houston, but clearly, sponsorship was more plentiful in the Houston market and Shell/Pennzoil is a prestigious sponsor. I’m sure Eddie Gossage is a bit miffed that IndyCar has scheduled another race in Texas, but if Houston is successful and they can get a good deal to run at Circuit of the Americas in Austin, the state of Texas could become a hotbed for Indy car racing. I’d certainly like to see another short oval or two back on the schedule and EVERYONE seems to want to be back at Road America, so it’s disappointing that it hasn’t happened yet.

MB:  I’m not sure about Houston, from what I remember the racing wasn’t spectacular but I don’t think TMS is coming back so I’m glad my state will still have an event & it’s a new event which is exciting. The schedule news from Miller sounds good but who knows how things will shake out.

JC: One of the few times I agree with Mr. Miller. We need history on our side and more ovals.

JH: Excited about Houston. Could be a great thing for the series especially since they have a great sponsor with Shell coming with it. But if I could ask for one track on the schedule for next year it would be Pocono.

TT: Exciting!  Houston has been ultra successful in the past, and I expect it to be a great market for the IICS in the future.  The possibility of up to 19-20 races being on the schedule is AWESOME.  A schedule longer than 6 months makes more sense

KM:  I am not a fan of the Houston race, I will say that this could be a good investment for IndyCar and Shell/Pennzoil. I personally thought that Mr. Mike Lanigan would want to bring back Cleveland before Houston because of the historic factor. Maybe Houston can have the Barber effect on it to make it a great race. As for Robin Miller’s news I’d love to see Pocono, Phoenix, Michigan, Road America and Richmond on the schedule. Not sure about Palm Springs because I haven’t seen that much on that track. As for Fort Lauderdale, questionable for me. And oh no to Circuit of the Americas. Terrible track. Heck yeah to Portland. This is what I’d like to see:
1. St. Petersburg (March) Returning
2. Barber (March) Returning
3. Long Beach (April) Returning
4. Sao Paulo (April) Returning
5. Phoenix (May) New Event
6. Indianapolis (May) Returning
7. Belle Isle (June) Returning
8. Texas (June) Returning
9. Milwaukee (June) Returning
10. Iowa (June) Returning
11.Chicagoland (June) New Event
12. Richmond (July) New Event
13. Toronto (July) Returning
14. Watkins Glen (July) New Event
15. Edmonton (July) Returning
16. Portland (August) New Event
17. China (August) Returning
18. Road America (August) New Event
19. Baltimore (September) Returning
20. Pocono (September) New Event
21. Houston (October) New Event
22. Fontana (October) Returning

Q: Darkhorse/s for the race?

JO: Mike Conway, who came out of nowhere to win last year. Hunter-Reay is always good at Long Beach. Pagenaud is likely to surprise a lot of people every race.

MB: My darkhorse is Simon Pagenaud.

JC: Any Lotus-powered driver is a darkhorse. Can we see Sebastien Bourdais in the podium? I’m becoming a fan.I have to say thought that Mike Conway could be a back-to-back winner.

JH: Marco Andretti. The way he was driving at Barber makes me believe that guy is out to prove something this year. I say he is the darkhorse for the weekend.

TT: Look for Mike Conway to stay strong here at LB, and I would also expect RHR to compete.  I don’t think Dario allows another bad week though.  I expect to see two Hondas and one Chevy on the podium.

KM: Marco Andretti, Graham Rahal and James Hinchcliffe

Q: Pole?

JO: Power

MB: My pick for pole is Dario Franchitti.

JC: Someone from the Penske Farm will have it.

JH: Will Power

TT: Power

KM: Dixon
Q: Winner?

JO: Dixon

MB: Scott Dixon for the win.

JC: Mike Conway or Ryan Briscoe.

JH: Scott Dixon

TT: I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say Graham Rahal.  I’d say Dixon in second (always the bridesmaid) and RHR third.

KM: Marco Andretti, he gets in with his grandfather and father at “The Beach.”

The poll question for the week is what track would you like to see be added to the 2013 IndyCar schedule.


Welcome to the First Edition of IndyCar All-Access!

02/23/2012

I’m proud to announce a new feature to Racing Mania. The feature will be called IndyCar All-Access. I have six writers/fans join me to recap the main stories throughout the race weekend and then preview the next race.

Here are the races we’ll be covering:

St. Petersburg-March 25

Barber-April 1

Long Beach-April 15

Sao Paulo-April 29

Indianapolis-May 27

Belle Isle-June 3

Texas-June 9

Iowa-June 23

Toronto-July 8

Edmonton-July 22

Mid-Ohio August 5

China-August 19

Sonoma-August 26

Baltimore-September 2

Fontana-September 15

Here are the seven people: John Oreovicz from ESPN, Matt Hickey from IndyCar Minnesota, Jerry Cruz from IndyCar Puerto Rico, Matt Bauer, John Hetrick, Tony Tellez and myself. We’ll occasionally have some other guests also.

Key:

  • John Oreovicz (JO)
  • Matt Hickey (MH)
  • Matt Bauer (MB)
  • Jerry Cruz (JC)
  • John Hetrick (JH)
  • Tony Tellez (TT)
  • Kent Mueller (KM)

Here are the questions:

What are your first impressions of the new car? Explain the goods and bads.

JO: I didn’t like the car at all at first, mainly because of the looks. I still find it hard to believe that Dallara got it so wrong when they had nine years to come up with something better. That said, my opinion of the car improved when I saw it in action at Sebring. It sounds good on track. It’s not a bad car in road course trim, but they’ve had to resort to some pretty extreme measures (like 26 pounds of lead in the nose) to get it anywhere close to balanced on a high speed oval. The best news for the fans is that the turbo engines are about 20-30 percent quieter so you can actually have a conversation when cars are on the track. I think these cars will road race just fine and I’m optimistic that the 2013 body kits will make the basic car look better.

MH: I like the new car and how it looks whilst moving. Also love new clutch paddles that will make standing starts better. Plus the most important feature is the safety features. Let’s just hope the oval aero package comes along nicely.

MB: The Dallara concept was at best my third favorite of all the candidates & the actual car didn’t do anything to improve my opinion. I liked the road course concept better than the oval but it’s not horrible. If it improves safety & performance that’s all that really matters.

JC: I was kind of disappointed when Swift Engineering was not chosen as the Chassis Manufacturer. I thought they had the better-looking, more aesthetically-sound, cool-looking chassis especially the #70 design. Yet, I can understand why INDYCAR chose Dallara Automobili…they just build safe cars. The chassis has been getting better looking as the team colors have been applied. I will wait until Indianapolis and review this one again.

JH: I am a big fan of the car. The drivers seem to think it has come along way since they began testing it in November. I am excited to see it in action at St Pete.

TT:  “Even if you stumble, you’re still moving forward.” This is one of those great quotes where no one really knows who said it. Well, I can assure you, they were an IZOD IINDYCAR Series fan. The old Dallara chassis were past their prime, and it was time for a change. They were heavy, bulky, and drove like a boat on road courses. So Dallara provided us with a new way to go. When it was revealed, I loved it. I never had those feelings of “betrayal” like some of the purists. It looked good. A bit long, and in oval trim, a bit longer, but overall, I was into it. Now, seeing all the liveries (save Simona’s) I think we have a winner. I can’t identify the goods or the bad per se, because I never drove either chassis. From a fan’s standpoint, I am just excited to see 26-28 of them on the grid come March 25th in St Pete. I will say this, those of you who complain about the lack of speed on ovals will barely notice an 8 MPH difference at Indy. 218 MPH is STILL 218 MPH. Stop hating, support the series.

KM: The things I like about the DW12 are reducing the pedals from 3 to 2. How it looks. And thats about it.

 

Who has the best 2012 livery (so far)?

JO: I don’t have an opinion here.

MH: Graham Rahal

MB: My favorite liveries so far have been sentimental choices the black & gold Lotus is beautiful & reminds me of Senna’s old F1 car. I’ve been rooting for the red & white Target cars & their drivers for so long I’ve become become attached to the scheme. The early 90′s livery is in part of why I became a Ganassi fan.

JC: Well, I got to tell you that Lotus has put some impressive livery. I like the Black and Gold scheme. As a Helio Castroneves fan, I certainly like the Shell Ultra livery.

JH: I love Ed Carpenters Fuzzy’s car. Although Foyt’s ABC supply is pretty sharp.

TT: I don’t often choose favorites, and while we haven’t seen ALL the liveries, I can tell you that without a doubt Graham Rahal’s Service Central Racing entry is the best looking car on the pre-season grid. The BOLD red and blue, used in large amounts, with small subtle details looks really sharp at speed as well as standing still.

KM: Simona de Silvestro and Graham Rahal in a tie. I do like Andretti Autosport’s test car livery, very cool.

What are your thoughts on the Heat races in Iowa and the newly announced race control?

JO: Heat races: I’m glad to see them do something to inject some excitement into the pre-race build-up for an oval event. When record speeds aren’t involved, single car qualifying is boring. As for the new Race Control, I think you will find Beaux Barfield and his crew are not as trigger happy as the old regime and that there will be greater consistency than we’ve been used to from IndyCar.

MH: Well I should be at the heat races so I am excited. And I like where Mr Barfield is taking the series from the stewards side of things.

MB: I like the idea of the heat races at Iowa, quals can be pretty boring so hopefully it will be exciting & a fair representation of speed. I’m very high on the new race control we need some consistency & transparency. Beau Barfield did a great job with ALMS & I think he will be great for the series.

JC: I’m for whatever INDYCAR thinks is best for the show. This is another thing to spice up competition and bring the casual fan to the sport. Downside, it will not be used in ALL ovals (except Indy, of course).

JH:I love the idea of heat races. Whatever Indycar can do a little different to generate interest is a good thing. Also it’s just another piece to help get the dirt track fans back.

TT: I’ve never really been a fan of any type of racing that included “heat” style racing. I never really took the time to understand it either, to be honest, so I can’t fairly comment on that. I will however say that Beaux Barfield has come into an unforgiving position, and created an almost forgivable environment. HIs choices as stewards are unshakeable, and garner respect within the series, and the changes he has openly discussed are leaps and bounds above what was in place prior to his arrival. I do have one complaint. Why a single year contract? If there is anything that says, “I don’t have complete faith in you yet” it’s a one year contract. Sign him to a multi year deal with incentives for him to stay here in Indy. Not only is he a charismatic character, and an all around nice guy, but he has excellent ideas for where the series should go.

KM: I like the fact that Beaux Barfield and Randy Bernard came up with the heat race idea. It draws more for the fan and that’s a good thing because the oval promotion needs to improve. I like the direction that Barfield is taking IndyCar in at least he didn’t use the word discretion 87 times in the rulebook! That has to be a great thing. Hopefully the penalty box rule will be added for the road and street circuits.

 

Your thoughts on standing starts in IndyCar?

JO: I can take them or leave them. It’s not a big deal to me like it is for some of my colleagues.

MH: Let’s do it! No one wants to see two rows of two going into the first turn like we see at Long Beach, standing starts would be a thrill!

MB: I really like standing starts they provide more excitement & are another test of driver skill.

JC: Again, I’m all for better competition and the show for the fan. Standing starts bring the drivers’ skills to the front and makes everyone vulnerable if you don’t do it right. Bring it!

JH: I do not know very much about standing starts but it seems like the drivers want them. If they can bring excitement to the sport than I am all for it.

TT: On most street courses, I believe they SHOULD exist. While there are some road courses where they may not work properly, I think it creates an exciting atmosphere. Most of our drivers in the IICS grew up in karting, and this is where their roots lie. So they all should be able to safely participate in this. Good Move Beaux.

KM: I like the idea a lot because the rolling starts in IndyCar are terrible. They need to do a three wide standing start at Indy.

Will the sixth race on ABC help or hurt IndyCar?

JO: It should help because theoretically there will be 3-4 times as many people watching. Plus free-to-air network races are much more attractive to potential sponsors. I’d like to see both networks shake up the announcer lineup.

MH: Don’t see why it would hurt them, more exposure!

MB: The switching back between networks causes some concern because it’s tougher for some viewers to find & because networks aren’t going to hype a race on another channel. It will be easier for fans or potential fans to stumble upon a race on network TV which is good.

JC: I’m not an ESPN on ABC fan since it is clear IndyCar is not important for them. Now, Network television bring more eyeballs as this moment until NBC Sports Networks grows. It should help, at least this year. It would be better if Streaming was available when ABC has the races. The fans could enjoy the Quals, some practice time before the race.

JH: ABC has more eyeballs than NBC sports right now. More eyeballs is never a bad thing even if the coverage is poor.

TT: Mid Ohio has been one of my favorite atmospheres and tracks since I first went to that race. The accessibility of the drivers and teams to the fans is exceptional in this place, and the environment is always electric. My one complaint has been never seeing the rest of the track as I have only seen the first 6 turns, and the last two from my vantage point at the facility. Now, we will be able to see it all. It’s a beautiful location, and a great facility run by a great group of people, and I am proud of them for getting their time to shine. I say this is a win win for both the series and ABC.

KM: If it helps the ratings I’m all for it. If not, NBC Sports Network should get back the Mid-Ohio race, they only lost it because of the 2012 Olympics.

What are your thoughts on NBC Sports Network and there new show IndyCar 36?

JO: Could be good if it’s done right. The reality show that focused on Paul Tracy and Forsythe Racing a few years ago was surprisingly good.

MH: Love the new things being added! I love how all of the FIL races will be shown

MB: The IndyCar 36 show was the most exciting thing to come out of the state of IndyCar presentation. It’s more enjoyable & easier to root for & against a driver or team that you’ve gotten to know.

JC: I think is about time there is some programming to grow the sport. You cannot rely only on the races. You need to promote the series in other ways. Look how the NFL, NBA, NHL and NASCAR have gone to other programming properties to grow their sports. It is all about making it more attractive for casual fans to follow.

JH: I love the new network and hope it will continue to grow. They do a great job promoting the sport of Indycar. Tony George looks pretty smart now choosing to go with the long term contract on VERSUS doesn’t he?

TT: While I would have liked to see some more cross promotion during the Super Bowl, I am ultimately looking forward to what the NBC Sports Network brings to the table. While some of their choices in talent may be lacking (we will all miss Lindy Thackston) I believe their desire for direction with the series is driven for success. Every single FIL race will be aired live on NBCSN, and this is a great opportunity for the FIL guys to shop for bigger sponsorships, and with bigger dollars, come a bigger field. That’s a good thing in Indy Lights. I would like to see a series developed to piggyback with the INDYCAR 36 which highlights the FIL series and shows the growth in the ladder series, as well movement within the development series’.

KM: I like the direction that NBC SN is taking IndyCar in, the show only adds more attention. Great bang for the buck.

 

Who will be the surprising driver of this year and which driver that has been a contender will falter?

JO: I think James Hinchcliffe could be the biggest surprise. He was very impressive as a rookie and I think he will help bring back the camaraderie that was once a part of the Andretti team. That will only benefit Marco Andretti. It would be very good for the series if Marco and Graham Rahal started winning races on a regular basis. Justin Wilson could spring a surprise for Coyne. Who will falter? Franchitti and Power certainly seemed to be the best with the old car. How will they adapt to the new one?

MH: Graham Rahal will do great and I can see Ryan Briscoe struggling this season to stay in the top 5.

MB: I think James Jakes will surprise & Helio will falter.

JC: My surprise driver this year would be Graham Rahal. I think he will be poised to have a great season after the learning curve he had with his new team last season. All the wrong things happened last year so he should have a breakthrough and replace Scott Dixon who will have a down year and be out of the Top 5.

JH: I don’t know that I would say the surprising driver of this year but I expect Rahal and Marco to have big seasons. They are very talented guys who should start winning races consistently.

TT: It is my belief that we will see Graham Rahal have a breakout year in 2012. Not only is he with a strong team in Chip Ganassi Service Central Racing, but he also has the proper mindset, and is ready to win. The maturity in this 23 year old man has come to the surface after the loss of Dan Wheldon, and his work with not only the DW Memorial Fund, but also his own foundation deserve respect and admiration. I see Graham winning three races this season and finishing in the top 4 for points

KM:  My surprise driver is Graham Rahal, that guy has a ton of talent. If it wasn’t for his terrible luck last year he would of challenged Dario and Will for the title, no doubt. I’d say Dario. The Honda engine is fairly slow in testing and Dario is getting old. That is a combination for disaster.

Do any rookies win?

JO: No. Rubens Barrichello could, but Simon Pagenaud is the only other one with a shot.

MH: No, but Newgarden and Barrichello will put on a show!

MB: I don’t see a rookie winning this year, the field is just to competitive.

JC: Well, Josef Newgarden and Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing have the potential to win at Texas and probably at Milwaukee. Rubens Barichello could win at Barber or Toronto. I think these two can win 1 race each.

JH: I don’t expect any of the rookies to win but Josef Newgarden should be strong on the ovals. Unless Barrichello is full time then it would not surprise me one bit to see that guy in victory lane later in the season.

TT: If Rubens Barrichello sets foot in a DW12 this season, we will see a rookie win. I would say Qingdao would be the most likely place for this to happen. So, yes. A rookie will win.

KM: Yes if Rubens comes if not maybe Newgarden at a place like Milwaukee or Iowa. Highly doubt it though.

Rookie of the year?

JO: Probably Barrichello, even if he doesn’t run Texas and Milwaukee.

MH: Newgarden assuming they get the engine thing figured out.

MB:If Josef Newgarden can get an engine & be on the grid for the entire season he’s the ROY.

JC: Even with Rubens Barichello on board. I’m going with Josef Newgarden. He has demonstrated he can win at any venue and with a “leveled” playing field this should be a good year for him (he needs an engine, PLEASE!!!)

JH: Once again Newgarden unless Barrichello is full time.

TT: If Josef Newgarden can get an engine deal nailed down, and get some seat time, I see him as a top ten contender. This kid has talent in every fiber of his being, and he wants to race, BADLY. However, (again) if Rubens is driving all but two races, no way does he not contend, and win the ROY title running away.

KM: Newgarden if Barrichello doesn’t come if not… then Rubens.

What engine manufacture will win the most races?

JO: Chevrolet. I think they have a slightly stronger team lineup.

MH: Chevrolet, they have the best drivers lineup in my opinion.

MB: I think Ganassi (Honda) will win the most races but Chevy has the combo of Penske & Andretti so I think they will win.

JC: Chevy should win double the time as Honda does. We have seen that Honda has been challenged by some “issues” during pre-season and they may be rusty from “manufacturers competition”. Honda may have gotten accustomed on keeping detuned engines.

JH: Anybody’s guess is as good as mine. I guess I say Chevy because I expect Will Power to win 5 or 6 of the races on road and street courses. I think that guy could win Indycar races in a go-kart.

TT: While Honda has been the ONLY engine of choice for what seems like forever, I have to say I believe Chevrolet has the most drive to succeed. With Barrichello and Kanaan teamed up, we will see KV Racing climb to new levels of superiority on road courses, putting Will Power’s dominance into the realm of afterthought. However, I still see Honda as the manufacturer to beat, with everyone else behind the eight ball. It will be an exciting season, for sure.

KM: Chevy because they have the most talented line-up out there. No doubt, I mean you got a three time Indy 500 winner, Marco Andretti, Will Power, Hinch do I need to say Tony Kanaan. Those five drivers right there have as much talent as anybody in racing.

Who wins the Indy 500? Out of the top drivers who misses it?

JO: I think it’s way too early to predict this, but I’ll go with Scott Dixon as the winner.

MH: Marco Andretti will win, and I don’t think Paul Tracy will make it.

MB: I think Dixon will win the 500, he was a few ounces of fuel away from getting the pole & the win last year.

JC: My pick is Helio Castroneves as he reaches his time with “Immortality” as the 2011 Indy 500 intro explains. By the way, that intro last year is the BEST I have seen…even better than the Delta Force ones from Paul Page. My gut feeling tells me that Mike Conway will again have his bad moment at Indy.

JH: I’m going to go with Marco Andretti. I just feel like that guy knows his way around the speedway and the Andretti team has been fast at Indy the past few years. If they get qualifying figured out I can’t imagine him not being a contender. Although how great would it be to see Hinch in the GoDaddy car in victory lane at Indy? Hope they have somebody take a picture of Danica’s reaction!

TT: This year, I see Scott Dixon winning the Indianapolis 500. Nearing the end of a contract, this is like an NBA free agent playing in a contract year. I don’t think his job is anywhere near on the line, but one thing about this driver is his desire and drive to win. I’ve seen his climb out of his car upset with a podium finish because he knows who and what mistakes were made to not put him atop that podium. If Tomas Scheckter can get in a car for the 500 he will be driven to succeed. In the offseason, I would say he was one of the drivers most excited about the possibility of getting a ride, and if he does get one, he is one to watch out for. You can also look for JR HIldebrand to put up a major fight and possibly spoil Scott’s day in the sun, but I still see the #9 winning, running away.

KM: Marco Andretti. The guy has great runs this year is his year. The person that misses is Katherine Legge because of the lack of experience on big ovals and she doesn’t have that great of an ovalista of a teammate (Bourdais).

Will there be a Oriol Servia type of moment this year? Please state the driver that you think will have that type of moment.

JO: Probably Justin Wilson. Or maybe Servia himself.

MH: Simona de Silvestro, I could see her winning at a race like Sao Paulo.

MB: I think Hinchcliffe will have a Servia type moment, he’s got a year of experience & a good team behind him.

JC: Read my pick at #7 for this one.

JH: I could see Ed Carpenter sitting on the front row at Indy and challenging for the win. Can you imagine seeing Ed passing a bottle of Fuzzy’s Ultra Premium Vodka to Tony George in victory lane!

TT: I think we see the opposite of this moment. I truly believe that we will see a single driver become the backmarker. This will be a driver who has a big team backing him, and a ton of money, but that is all. I won’t mention names, but I believe this guys talent has hit it’s limit.

KM: I’d say Sebastien Bourdais. He’ll pop a ton of eyebrows at the twisties. He and Rubens (if he comes) could be the only two drivers to challenge Mr. Power.

Thoughts on Rubens Barrichello coming to IndyCar?

JO: Good guy, good driver, but they’re kidding themselves if they think he will have the kind of impact Emerson Fittipaldi and Nigel Mansell did both on and off the track. If the seventh best F1 driver of the last 10-15 years comes in and suddenly beats up of the likes of Franchitti and Power etc., it makes Indy car racing look bad.

MH: Not official yet, but it would increase the strength of the field and he would bring a lot of positive attention to Indycar.

MB: Rubens has a lot of talent & could compete on road & street courses. I would rather see a young driver come in & develop instead of someone who is at the end of their career & has to settle for IndyCar.

JC: It would be nothing but positive. It would bring more fans to our sport as well as keep rising the level of competition. Two thumbs up!

JH: Brings legitimacy to the sport. Shows that Indycar racing is a credible series. 5 years ago there is no way an accomplished driver like Barrichello even considers coming to Indycar. We have come along way.

TT: From a marketing and PR standpoint, this would be HUGE. Where I see the biggest compliment to the series though, will be in the competition levels. This man has driven, and succeeded, at what many consider the top level of open wheel racing, and he will be a dominant force on the roads and street courses in 2012. However, I think he will surprise many with his oval ability at Indianapolis. Remember, he has won there before.

KM: I think its great because he brings a ton of attraction. Plus he’s a heck of a racer.

Thoughts on Danica leaving IndyCar?

JO: I wish her the best in the next phase of her career but I’m glad I won’t have to write about her as much anymore. Wake me up when the performance matches the hype.

MH: Don’t let the door hit you on the way out, she’s their problem now.

MB: Danica leaving won’t hurt much or at all, she got the majority of the attention at the expense of more talented drivers. I think it will be a great chance to expose fans to other talented & interesting people

JC: Being honest, I could not care less having her leaving IndyCar. I think she went for the money and forgot what her dreams were. I was a fan before (I have a big poster of her in 2005 IndyCar ROY RLR colors) but I could not be more disappointed how she dissed IndyCar. She just let money keep her from IndyCar immortality. I only wish Simona, Pippa, or Katherine win 2 races and Danica will be an afterthought.

JH: Don’t let the door hit you on the way out! But seriously it will be a great thing because we still have GoDaddy and they seem willing to promote Hinch. More attention on other drivers. I think Graham, Marco, and Hinch are going to be big stars in a few years. The good thing about those guys is that they seem to want to stay in Indycar and help the series grow. Although Marco has made no secret that he’d like a shot at F1.

TT:Who? Next Question.

KM: I don’t really care anymore because she really started to under achieve when she signed on in 2010 for NASCAR. Her average finishes went down a lot, it didn’t seem like she cared much. I’ll admit it I was a Danica fan in her rookie season. I was seven at the time but when Marco Andretti came on in 2006, I thought this could be the battle of the ages but it didn’t turn out that way.

Final car count (you can break down team by team if you so wish)?

JO: There will be 27 at St. Pete. It will be interesting to see how many Indy 500 entries materialize and how many of them actually get engines.

MH: 25-26, although I’d like to see it capped at 20 to make qualifying more intense (excluding Indy).

MB: I’m not sure about the car count but I think about 26 will make the grid

JC: I would say that at St. Pete we should have 27 cars. The series should average 25 cars for the season.

JH: 26-28 cars at each race. 36 or 37 cars at Indy.

TT: I think we see Ganassi with 4, RLL with 2, Conquest with 1 (part time), DRR with 1(2 at Indy), SSM with 2 (wait for it), SFHR with 1, ECR with 1, Foyt 1, Dragon 2, Penske 3, Shank with 1(part time), NH will run Indy Only (Scheckter?), KV 3, (4th part time), Andretti 3 FT, 1PT, Panther 1(2 at Indy with Buddy Rice and part time after), Coyne 2, BHA 1, and one more team out of nowhere for a part time with 1 driver. Total= 28 FT 3 PT with other one offs.

KM: 26.

Your top 3 in points at the end of the season are?

JO: 1. Dixon 2. Power 3. Franchitti

MH:  Power, Franchitti, Rahal in that order.

MB: I think if luck doesn’t play a big factor it will be Power, Dixon & Dario but I’m really hoping Dixon takes his third championship.

JC: #3 Helio Castroneves, #2 Ryan Hunter-Reay, #1 Will Power – All Chevy powerplants drivers…Honda will struggle to keep up. Dario Franchitti and Graham Rahal would be the best of the Honda class; Oriol Servia will be for Lotus Group.

JH: Will Power (just too good on road courses) Dario Franchitti (the guy doesn’t seem to know what bad luck is) Graham Rahal (the guy doesn’t seem to know what good luck is…that will change this year)

TT: I think this is the year that Will Power falls off the pedestal. I see a top 3 of Dixon, Rahal, and Kanaan.

KM: Power, Barrichello (if he comes if not) Rahal then finally Andretti.


Roundtable: Previewing the 2012 IndyCar Season w/ 4 IndyCar Writers!

12/19/2011

There has been a lot of predictions being made about the 2012 IndyCar Season. From who will go with who for engine supply and teams.  What new team will be the best? Who has the advantage for engines? What about the new races? What is your dream IndyCar schedule. All of those questions will be answered in this article. I managed to get a hold of  Zachary Houghton from IndyCar Advocate, John Oreovicz from ESPN Racing, Bill Zahren from Pressdog and George Phillips from Oilpressure to preview the 2012 season. They all said yes and answered my questions. I will be giving my answers in this roundtable. Here is a little Key.

  • GP= George Phillips
  • BZ= Bill Zahren
  • ZH= Zachary Houghton
  • JO= John Oreovicz
  • KM= Kent Mueller (me)

Q: What are you looking towards for the whole 2012 season?
GP: Like everyone else, I’m looking forward to the new cars nad the engine competition among manufacturers. So far, I can’t say I’m a fan of the new car. I think from the cockpit back, it is extremely ugly. Most say they don’t care what the car looks like son long as it races well – but I do. The looks of the car will have a great bearing on the marketability of the sport in the future. I’m a very superficial male, so I should know. One of my hot butons for the past few years has been lack of competition among engine and chassis manufacturers. Not only do I recall the nineties when you had Lola, Galmer, Penske, Truesports, Reynard, Swift and Eagle chassis to choose from – I go back to the sixties where almost every car looked different. It may not mean much to the general public that a Reynard beat a Lola in the 1995 Indianapolis 500, but it sure meant a lot to the hard-core fans. That’s why I was supporting multiple chassis manufacturers, although I understood it wasn’t economically feasible in today’s climate. Still, in a competitive world; I believe that it is up to Dallara to get it right as soon as the car is shipped. If they didn’t, perhaps the Swift, BAT or Lola chassis hit the sweet spot. With only one chassis manufacturer (again); Dallara has no real incentive to come up with a faster car. They only have to beat themselves. To placate fan’s disappointment with only one chassis, we were told aero kits would be available. For 2012, we won’t have those. I’m not sure we will in 2013 and beyond, either. One intriguing aspect of the new car is that everyone is starting from scratch. Never forget that the big teams can sometime outsmart themselves (Team Penske at Indianapolis in 1995). It will be interesting to see if a small team like Sarah Fisher’s, Dale Coyne’s or Ed Carpenter’s can figure something out about the new car before the Penske/Ganassi jugernaut can.

BZ: I’m looking forward to seeing home the new car pans out and if helps any of the smaller teams compete with the big three. The different engines will also add some welcome variables to things. At this rate it will be good just to see the schedule. I’ll also be interested in seeing how TV numbers go in 2012 and if the lack of ovals does anything to the popularity of the league. I guess it will be a good test to see if a majority twisty schedule can be viable with American fans. I’m also looking forward to watching Randy Bernard perform this season. I think the pressure is mounting on him to lead IndyCar in making some strides. He’ll have two seasons under his belt, which should be enough to have gotten the lay of the land. A lot of people will be expecting Bernard to make some moves in 2012, and it will be interesting to see what they are.

ZH: So many things! There’s the competition between the new engines, seeing the progression of the new DW12, watching teams like Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing and Ed Carpenter Racing grow, the return of Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing, tough competition on the Mazda Road to Indy, and of course, another Indianapolis 500.
If that’s not enough for you, there’s also USAC Champ Bryan Clauson getting to try and qualify for Indy, former F1 driver Jean Alesi trying to do the same with Lotus, and watching veterans like Dario Franchitti and Helio Castroneves duke it out with a new generation of drivers like James Hinchcliffe, J.R. Hildebrand, and Joseg Newgarden. Really, between a healthy car count, new car and engine questions, and a wild silly season, this shaping up to be an amazingly intriguing year. We have more question marks in terms of competition than we’ve had in a long time, and that can only be a good thing. It’s going to be a long winter waiting for that flag to drop!

JO: Obviously most of the focus has to be on the new car, and what a disappointment bordering on disaster it has been so far. I’ve seen ugly race cars and I’ve seen slow race cars and I can’t believe it took them nine years to come up with a car that is both ugly and slow. The engines, as you would expect from HPD and Ilmor, have been functioning to plan. Of course then there’s Lotus…
But the chassis needs major work. Based on the way they have semi-enclosed the rear wheels, safety was the primary focus long before Dan Wheldon got killed in Las Vegas. I’m not an engineer, but I can’t help but thinking that the huge plan area of the floor and the lack of downforce producers in front of the rear wheels are contributing to the car’s unpredictable high-speed oval handling. The guys working on the DW12 _are_ engineers and they admit they don’t know why the car has way more drag than the computer and wind tunnel numbers say it should.
Since they are re-doing the suspension and will likely need to make major changes to the aero package, why not try to make it look a little bit better? On one online poll, 98 percent of 6,000 voters had a negative reaction about the DW12′s appearance. It really is a cartoon car.
Beyond that, I’m watching to see if Dario Franchitti can effectively make it five straight championships. As we saw in Champ Car in 2007 when they brought out the DP01, the same old teams don’t automatically win all the races in the new spec car. Sure, Bourdais and Newman/Haas won the championship, but Doornbos/HVM and Power/Walker won races and kept NHR honest.
I’m also curious to see how INDYCAR rebounds from the Wheldon tragedy. In some ways, the series just seems to be pretending the accident (indeed, the whole Las Vegas event) never happened.
KM: I am looking forward to everything. The new car on new tracks. How the final schedule turns out and the racing. Plus, how the new race control looks like (more later)

Q: Do you think China and Belle Isle is a bad move for IndyCar’s direction?
GP: I’m not going to say either one is a bad move. China won’t win over any new fans running a street course in the middle of the night. I’ll probably be one of only about two thousand that will stay up to watch it live, but it is a good move financially for the series – so I’m all for it. Belle Isle is one of the most boring races to watch on television – and I’ve watched every single one dating back to their debut at the Isle in 1992. But given Chevy’s re-entry into the series, the series needs to have a presence in or near the Detroit area. I just wish it was at the two-mile oval in the Irish Hills at Brooklyn, Michigan.
BZ: I try to think of things like a random fan and maybe advocate for their interests, so I think Belle Isle is a mistake. It’s hard to say for certain given the new car variable, but Belle Isle in the past has been a Festival of Non-passing. I just don’t see legions of fans wanting to watch a race at Belle Isle, especially on TV. I think Chevrolet has a lot of influence in encouraging IndyCar to go to both Belle Isle and China. Detroit is obviously the home of GM, and China is a huge market for them. So from the standpoint of keeping a major sponsor happy, it’s probably a good move. Also, I assume IndyCar will get bails of cash to go to China, so that money will help subsidize races back here. I think the danger is getting into the business of making money off sanctioning fees and not being concerned with TV ratings. Champ Car at the end went to an attendance-based business model, where they focused on how many showed up at the track and just racing wherever a road or street circuit could pay their sanctioning fee. That’s an oversimplification, obviously, but TV ratings are the most important thing for attracting sponsors. If the race doesn’t draw ratings on TV, you’re in trouble. No ratings, no sponsors, no teams — no matter how many buy tickets at the local level.
ZH: I’m not a huge fan of races that far out of wack with our domestic time zones, but China is a huge potential market for a lot of companies. It’s sort of like Sonoma; the racing isn’t ideal, but sponsors love it to pieces, so it stays. If China can provide good racing, help attract (or keep) sponsors, and fund some of the other things the Series wants to do, then I’ll count it a success. For Belle Isle, I hope the racing is better than the last go-around, but it’ll make Chevy happy, and that’s important, too. Good racing has to be balanced with fan interest and keeping sponsors content. We’ll have to see if that lesson has been learned for those venues.
JO: Belle Isle is nothing more than a Penske stroke job. Roger delivered Chevrolet to INDYCAR and he got Belle Isle back on the schedule in return. The modern incarnation of that event is Roger’s baby. It’s a good track for a Formula Atlantic race. I’d rather see INDYCAR back at Michigan International Speedway (a track once owned by Mr. Penske before he sold all of his tracks to International Speedway Corp.), and you’d think that with the lack of ovals on the schedule, MIS would be back in play.
With China, I’ll believe it when I see it. I sat through numerous press conferences talking up plans for Champ Car races in Korea and China and none of them ever came to life. Tony Cotman says the China street circuit will be mega (3.8 miles!!) and his short-lived 2007 Las Vegas layout was one of the best street courses to come along in decades so I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. Randy Bernard has been tasked with generating income, and foreign race sanction fees are the easiest way for INDYCAR to pull in cash.
KM: I hate the fact the IndyCar is going to China because when I thought Randy Bernard was making the right decision by dumping an Asia parade he goes to China. As for Belle Isle that street course is the worst street course I have ever seen! No passing areas whatsoever. You could go to Road America, Road Atlanta, Sebring, Cleveland and Mosport but NO we gotta do street parades and turn IndyCar into CART of 1995 and 2003!

Q: What would be your dream IndyCar Schedule?
GP: Being old-school (and just plain old); my dream schedule would have tweny-two races with about fifteen being ovals. The ovals would include Michigan, Fontana, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Pocono (we’re dreaming, right?), Nashville (selfishly), Loudon, Pikes Peak, Nazareth, Kentucky, Texas, Charlotte and of course, Indianapolis. My road/street courses would be Long Beach, Road America, Portland, Barber (because it’s close to me), Cleveland, Toronto & Mosport.
BZ: I would like to see ovals like Chicagoland and Kansas back on the schedule. I’d like a 50/50 oval/non-oval split. I’m partial to the ovals, so I like to see Iowa, Milwaukee, Chicagoland, Kansas, Texas in there among others (in addition to Indy, of course). I’d love for IndyCar to get to a place where it had more tracks that wanted it than it had slots on the schedule. Unfortunately we’re not there right now. I’m also kind of a market-based guy, so I don’t expect tracks to be lining up to lose money on hosting IndyCar races, which I think is the issue at Kansas, Chicagoland and Milwaukee. Even though I live 45 minutes from Iowa Speedway, Chicagoland Speedway is my first love in IndyCar. Having said that, I’d argue that the races at Iowa Speedway were  the best of the entire year in both 2010 and 2011, including the Indy 500.
ZH: For road/street courses, I’d love to see Road America, Watkins Glen, and Cleveland added back to the schedule. Oval wants include bringing back Kentucky, Pocono, Phoenix, Michigan, and Milwaukee, if there’s a promoter that can make it work. I also think IndyCar needs to eventually look at going back to Las Vegas. You can debate oval or street course, but it’s too exciting a destination for the Series not to be a part of. I’m hoping there’s a good chance we see several of those tracks and courses return for 2013.
JO: Well, it wouldn’t include Belle Isle or China, for starters!
Of the current schedule, I’d keep St. Pete, Barber, Long Beach, Iowa, Toronto, Edmonton, Mid-Ohio, and Baltimore. And of course the Indy 500. I’d add road races at Elkhart Lake, Watkins Glen and Cleveland and would probably swap Infineon for Laguna Seca. The challenge would be ovals. I’d like to see Phoenix, Homestead, Milwaukee, and New Hampshire brought back. Maybe Michigan and Nashville too. I would not return to Texas for safety reasons – in fact, I’d avoid any of those  high-banked 1.5-mile tracks with the exception of Homestead, which I think is a safer layout – although INDYCAR’s last fatality prior to Wheldon occurred there.
KM: My dream schedule is really easy. 5 shorts ovals (1.0 and less), 5 long ovals (1.5-2.0), 5 street courses, 5 road courses and 2 ‘special races’ (Indy and Road America). To the short ovals keep Iowa, add Phoenix, Richmond, Loudon and Milwaukee. Long ovals; Chicago, Texas, Michigan, Kentucky, Fontana.

Q: What new team will be the most successful and why?
GP: Keep an eye on Ed Carpenter Racing. With Derrick Walker running things, they are putting together a pretty impressive staff. I think they will make some noise – especially in the first half of the season
BZ: Hard to say since we don’t know all the teams and drivers, etc. I like the look of Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing, though. I’m a huge fan of Sarah and Andy, and I think their driver Josef Newgarden is for real. Obviously proved himself in the FIL last year. The new partner, Wink Hartman, is bringing in a lot of cash, they’re building a new shop on main street Speedway and coming off the biggest oval upset in maybe the last five years when Ed Carpenter beat Dario Franchitti at Kentucky. So I like SFH Racing.
ZH: Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing isn’t new, but they haven’t been full-time for a few years. I think they’ve shown before they can be a very competitive team, and I’m expecting big things from them. SFHR and Ed Carpenter’s teams will be fun to cheer for, but I suspect a slower progression for them.
JO: What are our choices? Ed Carpenter Racing? Mike Shank Racing? Do we call Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing a ‘new’ team? Derrick Walker runs a good operation so Ed will have some good runs on ovals but they will likely struggle on road courses. Mike Shank Racing is likely to be the exact opposite, but there are a lot more road races in 2012 than ovals. I also think Josef Newgarden will have a few surprisingly good outings for SFHR.
KM: I expect RLLR to return strong especially with Takuma Sato all but confirmed their. Ed Carpenter Racing could be an underdog. MSR Indy will be strong on the twisties. SFHR could be a front runner with RLLR because of Josef Newgarden and his diversity from road to street to oval races. Overall, I like Rahal’s team a lot.

Q: Which engine package will be the strongest for 2012 and why?
GP: I’m putting my money on Chevrolet. Everyone thinks that Honda has a leg up becuase they have been in the series since 2003 and they were the first to have their engine in the car in August. But the Honda engine that drove Chevy and Toyota out of the series after the 2005 season was built by Ilmor. HPD will be building the new Honda engine. The Chevy engine will be built and designed by who? Ilmor. Roger Penske doesn’t make the wrong choice too many times, even though he was saddled with the underpowered Toyota engine in 2004-05. I don’t think that’ll be the case in 2012.
BZ: I couldn’t tell ya. I don’t really dive much into the fine technical statistics of the sport, to be honest. I don’t get too frothed up about who will drive where and who will have what until I see it on the grid. Hard to argue against Honda given their history. But, Chevrolet has something to prove since they basically left the series years go with their bow tie tucked between their legs. I hear a lot about Lotus, but the teams that are relying on them for engines are probably a bit nervous at how far they seem to be behind the rest.
ZH:  have to admit, I’m cheering for Lotus as an underdog, but I honestly think Honda has a bit of a head start on the competition. I wouldn’t count out any of the three manufacturers–they all know how to build an engine–but I believe Honda will possibly have at least an early advantage.
JO: It won’t be Lotus. I think it’s a toss-up between HPD and Ilmor. HPD has been operating with increased independence over the last decade, and it will be interesting to see how they react to having to develop engines again instead of just build them for reliability. As someone who worked for PacWest Racing, I won’t ever forget Ilmor’s awful 1998-2000 Mercedes-Benz CART engines that proved to be the eventual downfall of the team. Ilmor did most of the design work on the dominant 2004-05 Honda IRL engine and again, it will be interesting to see how Ilmor performs on its own.
KM: It will be a tight race between Chevy and Honda. But I think Chevy comes out on top because they have got to test and they supply better teams than Honda. Chevy is supplying Penske, AA, KV and Panther. That is better than Honda’s (Ganassi, SSM, and Foyt) Lotus has lost out on testing but could be a sleeper with HVM, DRR, and Bryan Herta Autosport with Tagliani behind the wheel (99% confirmed).
Q: Your Champion is?
GP: Tony Kanaan. With the Chevy engine and a year at KV behind him, plus the liklihoood of him being reunited with his longtime engineer Eric Cowdin – I think his experience will pay off in sorting out the new car. 2012 is his year.
BZ: Will Power. The guy has to be raging over the last two seasons and Penske has something to prove this year. I’d be happy for Will, but I’d love to be wrong and have some totally unexpected team and person shoot into contention next year.
ZH: There are just way too many unknowns right now to make a solid guess on that, honestly. You would think what we know of the schedule would favor Will Power, but I have a feeling things will pan out far differently than any of us would guess.
JO: I’m going with Will Power. They guy is very fast, he’s improving quickly on ovals (not that that will really matter much in 2012 the way the schedule is shaping up) and if he can cut out his rare mistakes and calm down his emotions, he’ll be tough. Franchitti is always a safe bet and it’s unusual to see guys stay competitive or (in Dario’s case) actually improve into their late 30s. Most guys start to lose a step then, and all you have to do is look at the likes of Al Unser Jr., Michael Andretti and Paul Tracy to see that. How long can Franchitti maintain the level of excellence he’s demonstrated since 2007? It’s one of the greatest runs of success in the hundred-year history of Indy car racing.
KM: My champion is Will Power. Ever since he came into the series in 2008; I have liked him a lot. His move to Penske really made him a championship contender. I say he wins one next year and then Dario retires. Will has had so much bad luck at the end of the season. And with the 2012 schedule being road and street circuits, Advantage Power!

I want to thank all of our guests to take time to answer these questions. It was very fun to do, and something I will look to do in the future for F1, ALMS, and NASCAR.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 387 other followers